Original Research

New Public Management, science policy and the orchestration of university research – academic science the loser

Aant Elzinga
The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa | Vol 6, No 2 | a263 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v6i2.263 | © 2010 Aant Elzinga | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 10 March 2016 | Published: 30 March 2010

Full Text:

PDF (385KB)

Share this article

Bookmark and Share

Abstract

In many countries - during the past three decades - there has been increasing alignment of public administration with neoliberal modes of governance driven by processes of globalization and privatization. Key is New Public Management (NPM) as an instrument for applying private sector or market-based techniques to public services. The paper concerns the implications and impact of these developments as they relate to the university sector where we are seeing an influx of bibliometrics to assess performativity with measures that are frequently far from adequate. These changes are related to the broader context of a globalized privatization doctrine of science policy that has gained currency in many countries. The analysis presented here probes and discusses a nexus between NPM, bibliometric performance audits, and a new paradigm in science policy. As such the paper seeks to fill an important gap in science policy studies and the literature on New Public Management more generally. It summarizes various characteristics associated with NPM, and expl icates the connection with methods of research evaluation now being introduced in academic ins titutions . It also takes up varying responses evoked within academe by the use of bibliometrics and current methods of ranking of tertiary educational institutions. Apart from gaining a better understanding of significant changes in the higher educational and research landscapes or disciplines and the interplay of these with broader economic and political trends in society at large, the aim of the paper is also to stimulate discussion and debate on current priorities, perceptions and policies governing knowledge production.

Keywords: New Public management; research policy; transdisciplinarity; postnormal science; Audit Society Agencification; Accountingization; peer review evaluation

Disciplines:Public Management and Governance; Management Studies and Research Management. Science Policy; Science Studies; Political Science


Keywords

New Public management; research policy; transdisciplinarity; postnormal science; Audit Society Agencification; Accountingization; peer review evaluation

Metrics

Total abstract views: 225
Total article views: 548

 

Crossref Citations

1. The public space and informal accountability: Verdandi’s study manual, the press and Uppsala University
Fredrik Bertilsson, Eleni Tseligka
Cogent Arts & Humanities  vol: 6  issue: 1  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1080/23311983.2019.1586622

2. R&D policy instruments – a critical review of what we do and don’t know
Ben R. Martin
Industry and Innovation  vol: 23  issue: 2  first page: 157  year: 2016  
doi: 10.1080/13662716.2016.1146125